Questions of faith.
Answers with a foundation.

pp. 13, 25 and 32–36; revelation and the first ground of knowledge

Original checked from our own source collection. Used for the epistemic approach, rather than as agreement with all the author's teachings.

Sections on knowledge, first ground and self-authenticating Scripture, pp. 12–17, 65–73

Original from our own source collection. Methodological reference, rather than wholesale acceptance of every assertion.

Chapter 4, Apologetic Method / A Sketch of an Apologetic, p. 223

Read in Logos; access to the book may require a license.

Introduction and distinction between different scopes of relativism

Article 3: the five ways

Historical primary source; not equated with complete Christian revelation.

Introduction: different types of cosmological argument

Introduction and alternative interpretations

10a–11b: The relation of the pious to being loved by the gods

Primary text; the Christian answer is further argumentation.

Research mandate: transmission and initial text of the New Testament

Note 2: Comma Johanneum

For evidence concerning transmission; no doctrine is grounded on this expansion.

Sections 4–7: Lists of Scripture and books recommended for reading

Historical testimony. The list is not simply identical with every present-day arrangement of the canon.

Prologue and saying 1

Primary text for comparing its claim; no recognition as canonical Scripture.

pp. 432–444, here the publicly accessible abstract

The abstract was examined, rather than the full book contribution with restricted access.

15,44,3: Christ, Tiberius and Pontius Pilate

Latin primary text with commentary by Mathew Owen and Ingo Gildenhard.

Southeastern Theological Review 3/1 (2012), pp. 15–26; especially pp. 16 and 25–26

On the method and its limits, particularly the status of the empty tomb.

SHERM 3/2 (2021), pp. 367–392; introduction and dataset description, pp. 367–368

Consulted through the SWBTS library. Methodological criticism of literature samples; no direct disproof of the resurrection.

Eleutheria 5/1 (2021), pp. 5–17

Discussion and historical evaluation of John Granger Cook's research; the source is no modern examination of Jesus' body.

Irish Theological Quarterly 80/2 (2015), pp. 157–172; especially pp. 160–163

Critical scholarly position on psychological hypotheses; no clinical diagnosis of ancient people.

Oxford University Press 2016, chapter 6, especially pp. 117–119

Chapter consulted through SWBTS. On precise distinctions in attributing Christological properties.

Questions and answers about early cosmic phases and the limits of knowledge

We Asked a NASA Scientist, Episode 42, 24 July 2023

Dated overview of open questions of origins; no claim to encompass all later research.

Variation, mutation, recombination and natural selection

Sections 1–2: Miracles, laws of nature and God's action

Section X: Of Miracles

Primary argument about experience and testimony; additionally SEP, Miracles, section 3.

Sections 5.1–5.3: Questions of explanation and the explanatory gap

Preamble and Articles 1–2

Primary document for the claim to equal dignity; the Christian ultimate justification is separately explained in the article.

Distinction between logical and evidential arguments, and between defense and theodicy

GraceNotes 22, pp. 1–2

Meaning from context; distinguish inward repentance and outward fruits.

GraceNotes 1, one page

4th revised edition, Grace Theology Press 2018; sections on grace, repentance, discipleship and reward

Original checked from our own book collection. No publicly accessible full-text file is distributed.

4th revised edition 2018, section The Basis of Assurance / Obtaining Assurance

Original from our own collection. Reference: Christ and his promise as the foundation, distinguishing assurance from feelings.

4th revised edition 2018, chapter 47, Eternal Security Depends on God the Father

Original from our own collection. Reference: enduring salvation and distinguishing discipleship, fellowship and reward.