Ten situations test whether you can apply the crucial distinctions. Choose an answer and read the explanation—even if you were right.
0 of 10 situations answered
Situation 01 / 10
Your conversation partner says: “True parts have been preserved; others were altered.” What is the best next step?
Reasoning and solution
Answer B. A partial model is logically possible. It must be specified and its justification examined. Its mere existence proves neither its truth nor its falsity.
A proposed prophecy in John 14 does not fit Muhammad. What follows immediately?
Reasoning and solution
Answer B. The scope of the conclusion must match the scope of the examination. John 14,26 names the Holy Spirit; further proposals require their own examination.
What does taḥrīf mean in each individual classical source?
Reasoning and solution
Answer B. Distortion of meaning, recitation, concealment and textual alteration must be kept distinct. Classical interpreters and transmitted reports are not uniform.
Your conversation partner mentions an early alteration before the text's wide dissemination. Which answer is factual?
Reasoning and solution
Answer B. Possible and demonstrated courses of events must be distinguished. Examine timing, the specific statement, textual witnesses and explanatory power.
The result is retained only for the duration of this page visit. No answers are transmitted to CHRISTOlogisch.
Support CHRISTOlogisch
Does this learning area help you?
This learning area is available free of charge. Working with sources, developing the answers and designing it take time and money. If our work helps you, please prayerfully consider supporting CHRISTOlogisch with an amount of your choice.